------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Take a look at donorschoose.org, an excellent charitable web site for
anyone who cares about public education!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_OLuKD/8WnJAA/cUmLAA/1TwplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Dawn
May 28, 2005

CALL FOR PURGING SOUTH ASIA OF NUCLEAR ARMS
By Our Staff Reporter

LAHORE, May 27: The four-day seminar on "Assessing people-to-people 
initiatives" concluded here on Friday with an emphasis on the need 
for making South Asia a nuclear weapon-free zone to ensure safety of 
its people. In a declaration read out after its conclusion, the 
seminar proposed joint opposition to the US bases in South Asia, and 
solidarity in the region with struggle against occupation of 
Palestine and Iraq.
The declaration was read out by Ms Kamla Bhasin and Mr Smitu Kothari 
from India and Mr A.H. Nayyar and Mr Muhammad Tehseen of Pakistan. 
Around 50 peace and rights activists from Pakistan and India attended 
the moot.
According to the speakers, the seminar proposed protection of shared 
ecosystems in the region and widening of its people-centred economic 
and trade activities. A museum of partition should be established to 
let the coming generations know about its painful impact on the 
peoples, they said.
The moot also demanded decolonization of the regional countries' 
legal and institutional fabric, creation of a South Asian news 
service and a popular magazine.
The participants pledged to publish a book and produce CDs in Urdu, 
Hindi and English containing a comprehensive history of initiatives 
in order to acknowledge, document and disseminate this important 
aspect of peoples' history. The moot, they said, further pointed to 
many challenges that needed to be addressed in future for the 
betterment of the peoples of the region.
These included difficult and humiliating visa situation, abject 
poverty, religious fundamentalism, vested interests, civil-military 
bureaucracy, military-industrial complex, repressive and 
discriminatory laws, prejudice and stereotypes, extra-regional 
influences, adverse impacts of neo-liberal economic globalization, 
and state-centred security conceptions.
They said the workshop was held to critically assess 40 years of the 
people-to-people initiatives for peace, justice and democracy that 
had been taken by groups in India and Pakistan.
This assessment was made possible by the concerted efforts of 
organizations in both countries, including the South Asia Partnership 
(Pakistan), Shirkatgah, Intercultural Resources, Lokayan and the 
Sangat South Asia. The gathering was supported by the Princeton 
Institute for International and Regional Studies.
The context within which these initiatives had taken place had been 
the progressive breakdown, since independence, of political relations 
between the two governments, which had critically affected a free 
flow of people and information.
The shared civilization history of the region had been fragmented by 
nationalism framed by antagonistic attitudes, they said.
They further read out that there had been efforts by political actors 
on both sides of the borders to deepen rift by stoking distrust and 
hatred. The people of the two countries had also faced adverse 
impacts of gradual militarization (of the region) and with the advent 
of nuclearization in 1998, a climate of tension and distrust had 
further compounded the situation.
They said Pakistan and India also shared endemic social and economic 
problems ranging from polarization of wealth and power to bonded and 
child workers, from discrimination and violence against women to 
marginalization of minorities and other vulnerable groups, from harsh 
living conditions for a majority of urban dwellers to growing 
displacement and dispossession of rural dwellers from their sources 
of subsistence.
Economic policies increasingly directed by non-national interests and 
an exponential growth in defence and nuclear expenditure at the 
direct expense of basic social programmes are among other ills the 
two neighbours had shared.
Numerous groups and movement had taken root in both societies to 
these challenges. Many of the groups felt strong need to exchange and 
share energies to collaboratively address these issues, they said.
The seminar participants shared a widening belief that the real 
security of the subcontinent lay not only in reduction and resolution 
of political issues, but also in a firm democratic process.
Thousands of initiatives had been taken over the past four decades 
not only by transnational organizations like the Pakistan-India Forum 
for Peace and Democracy, but also by theatre groups, women, students 
and professionals.

o o o o


Dawn
May 28, 2005

KARACHI: PEACE ACTIVISTS URGED TO PLAY ROLE
By Our Staff Reporter

KARACHI, May 27: Speakers at a discussion on Friday urged the peace 
activists of India and Pakistan to continue to put pressure on their 
respective governments regarding on-going peace process so that a 
sustainable peace could prevail in the subcontinent. Speaking at the 
discussion on "Imperatives of denuclearization and the peace 
process", organized jointly by the Pakistan India People's Forum for 
Peace and Democracy and the Aurat Foundation at the Rafia Chaudhry 
Auditorium, they stressed that if there was no pressure, peace 
process might derail.
The discussion was organized on the eve of 7th anniversary of the 
Pakistan's nuclear testing carried out on May 28, 1998. Brig A. R. 
Siddiqui, columnist M. B. Naqvi, journalist Zubaidah Mustafa, 
cartoonist Mohammad Rafiq "Feica", teachers of Karachi University 
Jaffer Ahmad and Nausheen Wasi, Anis Haroon and others also spoke.
They pointed out that no home work had been done prior to starting 
the peace process, as one could remember that emotions were running 
high just before this process began, but then all of a sudden some 
specific international conditions persuaded both the governments to 
start the peace process, so it was feared that if the situation 
changed, there was a possibility that the peace process could be 
reversed by the vested interest.
They said a large number of textbooks of both the countries were 
infested with material fanning hatred, and it is high time that both 
the governments should evolve a policy to review and revise syllabus 
so that the younger generations in the region grow up with a clean 
mind.
They said that the government should know that the weapons do not 
provide sustainable security, which could only be achieved by 
strengthening human resources. They suggested that the nuclear 
armament level between both the countries be lowered.
They said with the bomb the country has become even more vulnerable. 
They said at present the world powers needed Pakistan in their war 
against terror, what guarantee was there that there would not be a 
repeat action of the 1984 Baghdad attack when Israeli air force, with 
surgical precision, wiped out Iraq's nuclear facility.
They said that confidence among the masses of both the countries 
could not be built up by keeping nuclear arsenal and its delivery 
systems, which were being updated and improved every now and then. 
They said that the jehadis and the religious extremists parties in 
both the countries were a serious threat to peace.
They said bulk of the resources of both the countries were being 
spent on non developmental sectors like defence, while the social 
sectors like health, education etc were not given due priority.
They said that efforts be made to improve the economic conditions of 
the masses so that they could get the basic amenities, and their 
human rights were not violated.
They said that cities and urban centres in both the countries were so 
near to the border that nuclear bombs could not be used as, with the 
change in the wind direction, the fall-out could affect the areas and 
human settlements across the border, so the claim that nuclear 
weapons acted as a deterrent was not correct.
They also expressed doubts on the statements that nuclear assets were 
safe and secure, and said only a few days back some parts had been 
stolen from the KANUPP, which is also a nuclear facility.
A brief question-answer session also followed the speeches.
The peace activists after the discussion also organized a candle-lit 
peace vigil and the participants marched from the auditorium to the 
Press Club.

_________________________________

SOUTH ASIANS AGAINST NUKES (SAAN):
An informal information platform for
activists and scholars concerned about
Nuclearisation in South Asia

South Asians Against Nukes Mailing List:
archives are available @ two locations
May 1998 - March 2002:
<groups.yahoo.com/group/sap/messages/1>
Feb. 2001 - to date:
<groups.yahoo.com/group/SAAN_/messages/1>

To subscribe send a blank message to:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

South Asians Against Nukes Website:
www.s-asians-against-nukes.org



SOUTH ASIANS AGAINST NUKES (SAAN):
An informal information platform for activists and scholars concerned about the 
dangers of Nuclearisation in South Asia
SAAN Website:
http://www.s-asians-against-nukes.org

SAAN Mailing List:
To subscribe send a blank message to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

SAAN Mailing List Archive :
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SAAN_/ 
________________________________
DISCLAIMER: Opinions expressed in materials carried in the posts do not 
necessarily reflect the views of SAAN compilers. 

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SAAN_/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to