On Sunday, 11 November 2018 17:23:57 UTC-7, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > I agree. I think we should switch to threejs at a point when threejs in > sage is mature enough, even though not perfect... >
That was my plan, but I dislike when code copied between different interfaces behaves substantially differently, which is the case if you switch between Jmol and threejs. Given that it is possible to use threejs now explicitly, I think it is better to do that than alter defaults for SageMathCell compared to "plain Sage". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-cell" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-cell/3ec80107-d086-45c2-a69c-72211536f76c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
