Mon 2018-11-12 01:36:20 UTC+1, Andrey Novoseltsev: > > On Sunday, 11 November 2018 17:23:57 UTC-7, Kwankyu Lee wrote: >> >> I agree. I think we should switch to threejs at a point when threejs in >> sage is mature enough, even though not perfect... >> > > That was my plan, but I dislike when code copied between different > interfaces behaves substantially differently, which is the case if you > switch between Jmol and threejs. Given that it is possible to use threejs > now explicitly, I think it is better to do that than alter defaults for > SageMathCell compared to "plain Sage". >
For the record: reported again on sage-support: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-support/-sSOM0ULQjc/discussion -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-cell" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-cell/62ddc89e-b4bc-4c5c-b6e8-6936ec660a12%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
