Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 06:14:59PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Thank you for the further cleanup. One immediate problem is that it causes the
patch affine-E-as.patch to fail.
Ooops, I should have checked that. I am adding a +crystal guard on my
patch until the other patches are rebased. I won't be able to do it
today, so feel free to beat me to it. Btw: what is the status of this
patch?
I rebased the later crystal patches and removed the guard.
Currently a lot of tests in combinat/crystals/highest_weight_crystals.py
fail. I need to investigate why this is so (I am sure they passed when I
submitted
the patch a long time ago). In principle this patch could be submitted
to trac, but it contains some experimental code on KR crystals of type E_6
(using an order 2 instead of order 3 automorphism of the Dynkin diagram).
I might have to separate this out.
I know ... I got Rob Beezer on IRC, and he promised to handle this
patch relatively soon and in any cases before Sage Days 20.
That would be fantastic!
Cheers,
Anne
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-de...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
