> Thank you for the information, Sébastien! The circular problem is > interesting; maybe support for operations on circular words could be > added in the future.
Yes, good point! I am thinking about it. Moreover, I believe CircularWord would behave the same as a PeriodicInfiniteWord, so I am thinking of implementing both at the same time. >> Thus I think not having it return a word would be more appropriate. > > Note that DeBruijnSequences(10,3).an_element() could still return a > word. This second design choice is yours. I think an_element shoud be consistent with the iterator (either both return words or both return lists or both return tuples). And I am ok with returning a python object like list or tuple. It is more versatile like that and a word can still be created from it. Sébastien -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-de...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
