Hi Nicolas, On 13 Jan., 10:12, "Nicolas M. Thiery" <nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 07:24:53AM -0800, Simon King wrote: > > It turns out that sage/combinat/... uses the implicit assumption that > > SymmetricFunctions(...) is a strongly cached object, i.e., that it > > will persist in memory forever. But #12215 turns > > `UniqueRepresentation` into a weak cache. > > ... > Thanks for the update. Does this mean we should think of having two > variants of UniqueRepresentation? One for parents that are likely to > be created in mass, and for which we want a weak cache, and one for > parents that should persist?
Perhaps. I think #12215 would be the right place to do so - after all, the weak version of cached functions is introduced there. Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
