Hi Christian,

In CC: Vivien, Jean-Philippe,

By the way: positive_roots_by_height would be best implemented by
adding this feature into TransitiveIdealGraded. Ideally, one could do:

        for x in H.positive_roots().subset(grade=3):

Or at least, in the short run, and consistently with SearchForest:

        for x in H.positive_roots().elements_of_depth_iterator(3):

In general, TransitiveIdeal and friends would need some love.
Please create a ticket about it.

PS: I discussed on Friday with Vivien Ripoll, and they need precisely
this feature for positive roots in their project with Jean-Philippe
Labbé. You might want to team up with the later, since you are both in
Berlin, right?

Cheers,
                                Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to