Dear Sage-Combinat fans, dear Rob,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 03:02:50PM +0200, Florent Hivert wrote:
> I'd like to gather proposal and find an agreement on the names for
> SearchForest and post_process.
>
> Here are some proposal for search forest:
> - TreeGeneratedSet
> - ForestGeneratedSet
> - RecursivelyGeneratedSet
> - ChoiceTree
> - ChoiceForest
> ...
It should be mentioned as well that there is a closely related tool
TransitiveIdeal (and TransitiveIdealGraded) which takes similar input,
but handles recursions where each element can be built in several
ways, so an duplicate elimination must occur. In other words this is
making a search through a graph instead of a tree.
This tool deserves renaming too, and it would be good to actually have
a single entry point for both tools.
This naming problem was actually raised quite some time ago [1]. In
fact, I remember discussing this with Rob Beezer at Sage Days 15 when
he was reviewing #6000, and I thought we had come up with a good
naming scheme, but alas I just can't remember it. Rob, any clue?
Cheers,
Nicolas
[1] http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6000
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
