On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:16:37AM -0800, Volker Braun wrote:
> I just got bitten by this one, so I would appreciate a review for my fix:
> http://trac.sagemath.org/13764
I had a look at the patch, and it sounds reasonable indeed. Thanks!
While we are at testing whether any of the input is a generator, what
about converting it to a tuple instead of raising an error? This
would enlarge the feature set, and we would not have to fix the code
of IntegerVectors.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
