On 2012-11-28, Nathann Cohen <nathann.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > --bcaec5171ecd442ad804cf90b70b > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Helloooooooooooooo !! > > I guess it's a perfect illustration of **limits** of the object-oriented >> approach. >> RSK takes (p,q) in PxQ and outputs (a,b) in AxB. >> Does this mean we have to knock ourselves out creaing classes for each >> pair of classes P,Q we have? >> > > NOooooooooooooooooooo ! We have metaclasses for that :-P is it indended as sarcasm? (as you know, it's hard to detect in written correspondence)
Little I know about metaclasses in Python does not correspond to anything in Sage (I hear it is used in pickling, is it all?), and I wonder whether there is any documentation on this, if at all. (and as far as I know Python does not have anything resembling Haskell's algebraic data types). Cheers, Dima -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
