'Allo! On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 1:34:32 PM UTC+3, Volker Braun wrote: > > The group action framework is just the implementation, you still haven't > answered the question that this thread was about: Should permutation > actions on nested containers automatically discover one possible action or > not. As you said, in the group action framework you can implement either > possibility. You can also implement either if you don't use it. >
Yeah, I was thinking that because of the ambiguity that was being discussed in dealing with the nested actions, the best approach would be to provide a simple framework for specifying actions, and easy-to-access examples of That Sort of Thing, for people interested in using it, rather than putting in an implementation which half of users will think is mussed up. I'll be at the Sage-Combinat days in June; helping to build out the action code that others have already started developing sounds like a great way to spend at least a chunk of that week. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
