Hellooooooooooooooo !! > Yeah, I was thinking that because of the ambiguity that was being discussed in dealing with the nested actions, the best approach would be to provide a simple framework for specifying actions, and easy-to-access examples of That Sort of Thing, for people interested in using it, rather than putting in an implementation which half of users will think is mussed up. > > I'll be at the Sage-Combinat days in June; helping to build out the action code that others have already started developing sounds like a great way to spend at least a chunk of that week.
Ahaahahhah. I would be very surprised (and glad. but very surprised.) if you had a way to beat Dima's every efficient encoding of the action with a string ! :-) Have fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuun ! Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
