> Just to make this statement more precise: it will not be possible within the > next two years if Mmarco relies on your availability for this (there is no > blame in that statement, it's just a clarification that others might be > willing to work on this problem).
It is not a problem -- it's the way we set up our project! Its main features are designed for users who do not want to do any coding or even seeing a terminal environment. And that's good about it and one of the reasons why people like it! I recently talked about the project with Michelle Wachs -- she was actually asking about it! -- and she seemed to be really impressed. I think that didn't just come from the bare functionality, but from the easy possibility for her to interact with it. Anyone who is interested in working on more sophisticated features to be done from within Sage are very welcome to talk to me and/or to Chris Berg (though he might be a little less responsive these days) about it to see how we can approach it. But I would not like if I find out in 18 months from now that someone implemented a much stronger query machine (which is certainly possible) based on our ideas, but without collaborating with us! Cheers, Christian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
