great work, Jonathan! I've tested, and I've found the following problems:
1) part 1 hangs 2) compiling with -Wall gives this warning part.cc:865: warning: unused variable 'temp2' 3) part without arguments returns 42 Pablo On 7/29/07, Jonathan Bober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attached is a somewhat improved version. > > (I don't want to flood the mailing list with attachments, so I won't > send this file as an attachment to the list again after this.) > > The main improvement is that the code is better commented and more > readable now. The secondary improvement is an increase in speed - I > think it's about 15% faster, or something like that, at computing > p(10^9) than the previous code. (Although I'm not exactly sure what the > phrase "15% faster" means, and I was having some weird issues with my > laptop when I timed the old code, so I'm not sure exactly how fast it > ran.) There are no improvements in automated testing, so I'm no more > confident of this correctness of this code than I was of the old code, > but it certainly seems to work. > > I'm confident that this can be sped up more, but I'm not sure that we > can reach as low as 10 seconds to compute p(10^9). It certainly might be > possible, though. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
