2007/8/20, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yeah, I think that sympow uses extended precision for doubles. I never > ran properly on Cygwin on x86 cpus, so I am somewhat worried on > getting this to run properly on Sparc without some freaky gcc flags or > some sparc assembly. I don't think it is high on Willam's priority > list because it seems to be rather specialized, >
This is another linux-ism (x86-specific to boot). I would not worry about it. I can't imagine that this would be so important that it needs extended precision. Otherwise, sympow would be useless on anything not linux and not x86. didier --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---