2007/8/20, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yeah, I think that sympow uses extended precision for doubles. I never
> ran properly on Cygwin on x86 cpus, so I am somewhat worried on
> getting this to run properly on Sparc without some freaky gcc flags or
> some sparc assembly. I don't think it is high on Willam's priority
> list because it seems to be rather specialized,
>

This is another linux-ism (x86-specific to boot). I would not worry
about it. I can't imagine that this would be so important that it
needs extended precision. Otherwise, sympow would be useless on
anything not linux and not x86.

didier

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to