On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 05:20:39PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > >> Also, [10..1] now returns [10], it should probably return the empty > >> list. What about [10,11,.,0]? Also the empty list? I think so. > >> Thoughts?
I just want to say that despite the fact that I think [1..10] notation is great, I don't like the idea of [1,3,..,10]. This notation, I think, can be confusing in the long run. Along the same lines, I think [1..10, step=2] is a great notation. If the user wants a list that is more complicated, then they can try building it from other constructs. Soroosh --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
