On 10/12/07, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Yi,
>
> It's definitely a start. I absolutely need Cython compatibility--the
> whole reason I'm using SAGE is the ease at which I can write optimized
> code.
Very interesting :-)
>
> Should we make this a trac ticket? Why can't the dsage worker just
> execute a load command?
>
Because the workers don't run Ipython, etc. They are just running pure
python after all preparsing, etc.
However, don't worry, you can easily just embed/inline cython code
in a .sage file as illustrated below, so the fact that loading .sage
files works is enough. E.g.,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ more foo.sage
cython("""
def foo(x,y):
return x*y
""")
print foo(2,3)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ sage
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| SAGE Version 2.8.6, Release Date: 2007-10-06 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information. |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage: load foo.sage
6
sage:
Exiting SAGE (CPU time 0m0.04s, Wall time 0m14.25s).
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
