On 10/27/07, Michael.Abshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 1. fortran compilers: did you want to switch to gfortran?
Yes I "want to", but we better be careful until gfortran becomes ubiquitous, i.e., its in XCode on OS X and standard on Linux box. I.e., we should use g95 now, then switch to gfortran in a year or two. Users must always have the *option* to use gfortran instead of g95 very easily though, since some people consider the prebuilt g95 binary (or any binary for that matter) a huge evil security risk. > >> 2. atlas: should this be part of the sage build > >> Yes, definitely. Though I think switching to include atlas by default will have to involve "some careful thought". > There is already an optional atlas.spkg. I plan to update it to 3.8.0 > soon and fix the following issues: > > - full Lapack (as you mention above) > - use of sage_fortran to build the F77 wrapper. the --no-f77 flag > doens't work properly. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
