Yuck, that's a terrible license. The second paragraph is rather ambiguous:
Redistributions in binary form must not misrepresent ... other materials provided with the distribution. sounds like the following would violate this: you distribute documentation with your software... the distributed binary is compatable only with 64-bit hardware, and you claim to be 32-bit compatable in the docs. Also, the third paragraph is missing a "not", which makes it nongrammatical. *yay*. Fortunately, it's close enough to the MIT license, that if you pointed these flaws out to him, he might change. On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Bill Hart wrote: > > > > On 24 Nov, 19:22, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> There is the file written by Paul Hsieh to fix this for many systems: >> >> http://www.azillionmonkeys.com/qed/pstdint.h > > Grrrr. Is the "license" at the beginning of this file GPL compatible? > > Bill. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
