On Nov 24, 4:38 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 24, 2007 4:24 PM,Paul Hsieh<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am considering just dual licensing everything just GPL v2.1 and BSD > > though I guess I should look at the MIT license. Basically I would > > just like the file to be widely enough used that I should be able to > > Many thanks for being so helpful! > > I don't personally see a reason to dual-license under both GPL and BSD, > since anything BSD licensed can be used in any GPL project. Technically, > the GPL license is just "BSD + extra restrictions". I would chose > BSD over MIT, since BSD is more popular and widely known. > (Just make sure to use the modified BSD rather than the original > version.)
Updated. Version 0.1.9 now specifically uses the BSD license. -- Paul Hsieh http://www.pobox.com/~qed/ http://bstring.sf.net/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
