Singular's subst() command itself appears to be very leaky, I don't know why we expect to be able to plug these leaks in libSingular.
On Sat, 8 May 2021, 13:41 Markus Wageringel, <markus.wagerin...@gmail.com> wrote: > vdelecroix schrieb am Freitag, 7. Mai 2021 um 10:09:59 UTC+2: > >> I propose to switch to naive symbolic >> evaluation. This is infinitely slower but at least does not >> leak memory. >> > > Recently, I have looked into performance problems of multivariate power > series. One of the bottlenecks is the use of subs() of polynomials, so I am > worried that the proposed change has an unforeseen impact on performance in > other places, especially if this is rushed into 9.3 at this point. This is > a trade-off between running out of memory and running out of time in > computations. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/efeba33b-a44c-4b75-b6d9-45c5c0c63e49n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/efeba33b-a44c-4b75-b6d9-45c5c0c63e49n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq17KZ%3DKX3qjfQkvBSkQ93qt79GYWstzkQczFFEJ%3D1rjJw%40mail.gmail.com.
