On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 1:46:41 PM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 9:06 PM Matthias Koeppe <matthia...@gmail.com> wrote: > My 2023 summary of the situation: > > 1. I would be in favor of abandoning the Sage distribution (despite the fact that I have certainly put a lot of time and energy into it) **if** it is determined that the user community is sufficiently served by conda-forge packaging. > But I think that this would require for more developers to engage with the conda-related issues (example: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35528).
This can be done if we drop the ballast, not any other way. No. Abandoning the Sage distribution would be done in 1 shot. Doing it 1 package at a time makes no sense. As I explained (cut away in quote), ""The big problem is that the middle ground between "Complete Sage distribution that works in most use cases" and "No Sage distribution" is worse than both of the extremes. By removing spkgs one by one, we would make the Sage distribution less useful. So this is not a meaningful process.""" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/4729a7ed-60af-4ac0-b9f8-d856c3783596n%40googlegroups.com.
