On Mar 30, 2008, at 6:31 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> > Hello folks, > > there have been a large, nebulous set of rules regarding how things > are done in trac, patch review and merging and the Sage development > process in general. Now I finally took the time to clear those up and > I put a *draft* of the guidelines up at > > http://wiki.sagemath.org/TracGuidelines > > What I wrote there is obviously not the final version and none of the > rules are written in stone. I would actually like a discussion about > "the rules" to clear any potential issue where things are either wrong > or unclear. I consider what I wrote down the consensus from having > done releases for the last four months, but even I do make mistakes ;) > > I am working on additional sections on workflow and so on. I believe > that eventually the content of that Wiki page should go into the > documentation or that at least a link from the official doc should > point to that wiki page. On a quick skim-read, I found the "Sage Specific" paragraph very confusing. Are you trying to say that if someone makes up their own version of Sage that ships different versions of packages to the ones we normally ship, then they are on their own? Or something else? david --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
