> The biggest issue with the reliability of the CI is a deep design decision in the way the tests are setup. > Many doctests have an inherent random element, and this is mostly on purpose to increase the surface > of code paths that are tested and thereby discover new bugs. The disadvantage is that unfortunately > some test runs will produce failures that are not connected to the changes of the PR. ...
Is this still true? My understanding is that all CI runs now use the same random seed, so I didn't think this was the "biggest issue" any more. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/28752ef0-18cf-413f-ba7c-3fda1b52476fn%40googlegroups.com.
