On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:28 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>  On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  >  >  However, I even consider this a python fault (i.e. I belive a python
>  >  >  library/module should be working no matter which files you put
>  >  >  around), but I think this could be fixed by using relative imports in
>  >  >  python2.5.
>  >
>  >
>  >  But then again, we are not going to break compatibility with python2.4
>  >  in sympy, because many users just have python2.4 as default, i.e.
>  >  Debian has switched to python2.5 just couple days (!) ago. All people
>  >  running gentoo, or Debian stable, or Debian testing have python2.4.
>  >  People can blame Debian for being slow, but I don't care, those are
>  >  the real life constrains, and I rather view it as a fact, that python
>  >  import statements were insufficient for a long time, so it also takes
>  >  a long time to get this fixed for all users.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>  You could add something to your setup.py that deletes
>  the old site-package/sympy/* files, before doing the
>  standard things it does (calls the setup function).   Then
>  Sympy's setup would work fine with any Python install.
>  Give it a shot.

I added exactly this into the spkg-install script:

http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2941

Ondrej

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to