Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On May 2, 2008, at 2:39 AM, mabshoff wrote: > >> On Apr 29, 7:14 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:53 AM, mabshoff >> <SNIP> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've made a trac ticket for this, since it seems to have got stalled: >>> >>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3052 >>> >>> William >> Robert, >> >> I have come across a case that might cause some trouble: If you change >> the permissions on a file you need to make a mercurial checking since >> hg claims the repo has been changed, which is true. But export that >> changeset and it is empty. GIT handles renames and permission changes >> and also prints those status changes in the log. So, does hg do >> anything about those changes internally and is it just the log that is >> insufficient? In the end it will not matter much since we can just add >> a list of files whose permissions have to be changed and restore them >> if it causes trouble. In case of spkg-install & friends for example >> that is automatically taken care of by first making the scripts >> executable before they are being run by sage-$FOO. > > Yep, that is one of the things I've noticed. The patch comment is > insufficient in this case.
Can the git-style diffs somehow help? hg diff --git Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
