Rebuilt 3.0.5 and didn't have any issues this time. Cycle counter gave (1.68e+09) this time around and zn_poly built in about 2 minutes or so. I also rebuilt 3.0.3 and likewise didn't have any problems. Sorry for the phantom bug report. Thomas
On Jul 17, 6:36 am, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 16, 2008, at 11:54 PM, tkeller wrote: > > > I may have been imprecise. To clarify, zn_poly built, then displayed > > this message: > > Calibrating cycle counter... ok (3.84e+18) > > Okay, this means that zn_poly thinks your clock speed is around 3.84 > billion GHz. (Yes, 3.84 * 10^18 cycles per second.) This means > zn_poly thinks it's allowed to spend a bit longer (!) on the tuning > process. > > I assume your machine is not really that fast. > > It's possible that either my cycle counting code is not working on > your machine, or that something like getrusage is not working as I > expect on your machine, or maybe some other weird timing fluke. Could > you try building again, to see if it's easily reproducible? > > david --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
