I changed the name to: "Implementing number fields defined by non-monic polynomials" and have this comment:
It's not clear to me exactly what Nick means: defining polys in Z[x] with leading coefficient -1, or something more general over Q, or also relative number fields. 2008/9/2 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On Sep 2, 12:46 pm, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Implementing non-monic number fields would be hard, but not if the >> leading coefficient is a unit :) Could a ticket be opened, mabshoff? >> >> Nick > > Hi Nick, > > this is now #4041, but someone might want to come up with a better > description. > > Cheers, > > Michael > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
