OK. It was just a thought. I guess it would only matter to people were going straight to the source page but weren't following things on this group, which is probably a small number of people.
-Marshall On Oct 17, 8:02 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Harald Schilly wrote: > > On Oct 17, 2:48 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> We sort of have this now. Notice how the webpage still points to 3.1.2.. > > > Just to make this clear: I update the webpage rather late, because it > > doesn't satisfy a normal user, if it would say 3.1.3 but there are > > only sources. Therefore, I wait until most of the mirrors have the > > binaries and no serious problems arise. I think that's a better > > solution than being too accurate about the real state of development. > > I totally agree with your decision. I think it also addresses the > "recommended version" question nicely as well. > > Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
