It's possible that you're using html or some other markup in your e-mail that some of us using text-based clients aren't getting. The main problem with the way your message appears for me is that the exponents are not paired with their bases. It's totally unreadable. Whereas many mathematicians can read LaTeX without compiling it. :-)
You may be able to see the effect in the section below. David On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Martin Rubey < martin.ru...@math.uni-hannover.de> wrote: > > William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I don't personally know it, since it's pretty hard to read that ASCII > > art in email. I know some people (Chris Mihelich and Ken Ono) who > > would likely instantly know... but you should typeset a short note > > about this in tex to make it more palatable to mathematicians. > > Hm, while we are at it, maybe you could point out to me what you find hard > to > read, since then I could improve on it. > > n > [x ] f(x) is the n'th coefficient in f(x), the diffeq does not look nicer > in > LaTeX, I'm afraid. > > > > n > > > [x ]f(x): > > > 2 3 (iv) 2 2 , 3 ,,, > > > x f(x) f (x) + (20x f(x) f (x) + 5x f(x) )f (x) > > > > > > + > > > 2 2 ,, 2 > > > - 39x f(x) f (x) > > > > > > + > > > 2 , 2 2 , 3 ,, > > > (12x f(x)f (x) - 15x f(x) f (x) + 4f(x) )f (x) > > > > > > + > > > 2 , 4 , 3 2 , 2 > > > 6x f (x) + 10x f(x)f (x) - 16f(x) f (x) > > > > > > = > > > 0 > > > , > > > 2 3 4 > > > f(x)= 1 + x + 2x + 3x + O(x )] > > Martin > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
