On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Martin Rubey <martin.ru...@math.uni-hannover.de> wrote: > > William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I don't personally know it, since it's pretty hard to read that ASCII >> art in email. I know some people (Chris Mihelich and Ken Ono) who >> would likely instantly know... but you should typeset a short note >> about this in tex to make it more palatable to mathematicians. > > Hm, while we are at it, maybe you could point out to me what you find hard to > read, since then I could improve on it.
I'm using gmail and the fonts are proportionally spaced, so ASCII is mangled (of course, I'm being lazy -- I could paste it somewhere). Also, when I think about math from a more "theoretical point of view", and really prefer latex typesetting. I'm not suggesting anything is wrong with Fricas's very nice ascii art. How is fricas going these days, by the way? > > n > [x ] f(x) is the n'th coefficient in f(x), the diffeq does not look nicer in > LaTeX, I'm afraid. > >> > n >> > [x ]f(x): >> > 2 3 (iv) 2 2 , 3 ,,, >> > x f(x) f (x) + (20x f(x) f (x) + 5x f(x) )f (x) >> > >> > + >> > 2 2 ,, 2 >> > - 39x f(x) f (x) >> > >> > + >> > 2 , 2 2 , 3 ,, >> > (12x f(x)f (x) - 15x f(x) f (x) + 4f(x) )f (x) >> > >> > + >> > 2 , 4 , 3 2 , 2 >> > 6x f (x) + 10x f(x)f (x) - 16f(x) f (x) >> > >> > = >> > 0 >> > , >> > 2 3 4 >> > f(x)= 1 + x + 2x + 3x + O(x )] > > Martin > > > > > -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
