On Feb 18, 8:37 am, Martin Albrecht <m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
wrote:
> > So I'd like to know whether the focus should be on trying to
> > get Macaulay2 integrated in Sage, or to develop this stuff natively in Sage
> > using Macaulay2 as a cheat sheet (= porting functionality to Sage bit by
> > bit, I guess is what I'm saying).
>
> Hi, due to the issues pointed out by Michael I guess porting stuff to Sage
> should be the preferred option for now. I guess a start would be to figure
> out what user's really really like about M2 and then see what we can do about
> that. However, that strategy might not be well received by the audience of
> SD14?
I can imagine that will not help. Today I am surprised that no one
ever made a push back in the good old days of 2006 to include M2 in
Sage since back then the hurdle was much, much lower. These days
unfortunately it is quite touch to get an spkg into standard Sage.
> Cheers,
> Martin
Cheers,
Michael
> --
> name: Martin Albrecht
> _pgp:http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
> _otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF
> _www:http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb
> _jab: martinralbre...@jabber.ccc.de
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
