On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Alex Ghitza <aghi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> We will have a docday this Saturday, with the insanely ambitious goal >> of getting to 70%. This is probably not humanely possible for a >> single person to do in 8 hours, so I hope I'm not the only one (I >> estimate it takes *at least* 3 minutes per doctest, which comes to >> 37.8 hours for 756 doctests). >
I just noticed that doctesting extended_integer_ring.py would make a really big dent -- it has 128 functions in it of which only 4% are doctested now, most functions are very easy to doctest, *and* extended_rational_field.py, which should be very similar, has 98% coverage. If somebody wants to easily make a big dent in the coverage problem, volunteer now to doctest extended_integer_ring.py, and do it asap: rings/extended_integer_ring.py: 4% (6 of 128) rings/extended_rational_field.py: 98% (73 of 74) -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
