In sage/rings/fast_arith.pyx there are C int & long long versions of some utility functions, which I have just been adding to. All the functions come as _int and _llong (or _longlong) versions with practically identical code.
Similarly in sage/modular/modsym/p1list.pyx there are various functions in bot _int and _llong versions. Question: in some cases the llong version, despite the name, uses int types. Is that a mistake (from copying and pasting code without editing it properly)? It looks so to me and I am in the process of changing where necessary. On the same topic, some other questions: (a) should we always use "llong" as an abbreviation for "long long" or "longlong"? It would be nice to be consistent. (b) I can't work out why in fast_arith there are *classes* arith_int and arith_llong with most of the functions methods of those. I can see no reason why all those functions are not just stand-alone. Does someone have a reason? John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
