All tests passed on an intel mac pro running 10.4.11.

The tests took 6975 seconds, which seems like a big increase from
3.0.2 (4818 seconds) and 3.4 (5358 seconds).  Is this simply because
of the additional doctests, or are there serious speed regressions
somewhere?  I recall some discussion about benchmarking each release
but I don't know if that has actually been done.

-Marshall

On Jun 18, 4:19 pm, Jaap Spies <j.sp...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> Jaap Spies wrote:
> > Craig Citro wrote:
> >> Hi all,
>
> >> Here's rc3, which *should* be the last rc for this release cycle. I've
> >> tested it on my laptop and the build farm, and I've had no troubles at
> >> all, and it's currently going on a few other machines, so hopefully
> >> that'll turn out fine, too. Please test it and let me know if you run
> >> into anything at all.
>
> >> Source and sage.math binary are here:
>
> >>  http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/craigcitro/release/sage-4.0.2.rc...
> >>  http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/craigcitro/release/sage-4.0.2.rc...
>
> >> I believe that the necessary upgrade bits are sitting here, but I
> >> haven't tried it:
>
> >>  http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/craigcitro/release/sage-4.0.2.rc3/
>
> > Upgrading went well on Fedora 10, 32 bit. Running tests now.
>
> All tests passed.
>
> Jaap
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to