I made a few changes to the Wikipedia page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sage_(mathematics_software)
to push the 'features' further up the list. I also added a section on advantages/disadvantages of Sage. Just sticking advantages will lead to their deletion, as it wont be a neutral point of view. I'd like to get similar information on the Wikipedia pages for the 3 M's too, but it needs to be objective. Jon McLoone is a Wolfram Research employee who is an advertising manager http://members.wolfram.com/jonm/ he goes over the Wikipedia page with a fine tooth comb, so any comparisons with Sage need to be objective. (He will probably try to get them deleted anyway), but IMHO, a Wikipedia page on Mathematica should list alternatives, in the same way I've stuck on the Sage page. But as I say, these need to be objective. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
