Hi, Thanks for pointing that out. I have made a 1.51b spkg, but decided to wait a week or two for the final 1.51 to come out. But I didn't realize that the 1.49b install was broken.
Anyway if you have any interest in helping out, you should get a trac account. Just email William Stein for one. I am excited about their cleanup too, I think with a little more work biopython can be made a standard part of sage, but that will require a developer vote. -Marshall Hampton On Jul 26, 12:05 pm, tkeller <thomas.e.kel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for all the recent work upgrading the base python distribution > to 2.6, I imagine it was quite a task. I noticed that installing the > biopython-1.49b spkg is broken from the upgrade . I have upgraded the > spkg to 1.51b and it installs and works fine on my sage-4.1 > installation. Is there a place to upload supplemental spkg's , or > should I get a trac account? > > A side benefit to upgrading the spkg is that the last few patches > finally removed the mxText dependency, so it is now a clean install > aside from requiring Numpy. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
