Tim Lahey wrote: > > On Aug 11, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > >> 1) Some things 'fail' a test as they are now evaluated in Maxima. e.g. >> >> sage: integral( exp(-x^2)*ln(x), x, 0, oo) >> Expected: >> integrate(e^(-x^2)*log(x), x, 0, +Infinity) >> Got: >> -1/4*(euler_gamma + 2*log(2))*sqrt(pi) >> >> > > Is this the only integration test failure? Based upon the session in > your > e-mail it looked like it. If it isn't, I'll try to find the appropriate > Expected answers, if necessary.
I did not notice any others. Here is the full log http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/6709/test.log >> I can imagine updating Maxima is going to take some people some >> convincing, as I'm aware updates have suffered some problems. But it >> also corrects some problems. It is also the only easy way to get >> Sage to >> build on Solaris SPARC, as the latest ECL is the only one to build on >> Solaris SPARC properly. But ECL can't be updated without updating >> Maxima, due to a bug in Maxima. >> >> Dave >> > > I think updating Maxima is a good thing. I'd like to see closer tracking > since there are a number of useful features that are being upgraded > (e.g., > integration). Solaris SPARC support provides another good impetus. > > Cheers, > > Tim. > > --- > Tim Lahey > PhD Candidate, Systems Design Engineering > University of Waterloo > http://www.linkedin.com/in/timlahey > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
