Hi. On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:47 PM, William Stein<wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Personally, I am for accepting pynac's answer by default as it >> would massively speed up test like "if x in list" for symbolics. > > We must default to pynac, in my opinion. The question then just becomes > how to make pynac's comparison better.
Cool. I just opened a ticket http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6799 I will try to see how much breakage is caused by a brutal swich-over. Having something like a ".full_simplify()" within pynac should be a gradual and long-term goal for sage symbolics. Some relevant comments are in here http://www.ginac.de/FAQ.html#sincos Cheers, Golam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
