Hi, On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:44 PM, kcrisman<kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > While (1) and (2) syntaxes are encouraged, (3) will >> > remain valid until we sort out the coersion issue >> > and update all doctests, tutorial etc. BTW, I did update >> > some of the doctests including the docstrings that you get >> > via "integrate?" >> >> Sounds like we should throw a deprecation warning on it. >> > > Yes, this would definitely require it.
I agree. Personally, I would prefer to wait until we have a proper coersion model from tuple/list to SR. So that we can enforce it within a definite time-frame after issuing the warning. > Your work on symbolics is impressive and valuable, Golam - keep it up! Thanks! Frankly, I am just trying to strengthen the tiny corner of Sage that are needed for my own work. Cheers, Golam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
