Dear Sage(-Combinat) devs, dear graph drawing fans, Due to an urgent itch, I took some time today to work on the graphviz+dot2tex integration. For a sample application, see:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/nthiery/bruhat-D4.pdf Which was produced by the (too long) mantra: sage: W = WeylGroup(["D", 4]) sage: G = W.bruhat_poset().hasse_diagram() sage: G.set_latex_options(format="dot2tex") sage: view(G, tightpage = True, pdflatex=True) This led me to do some refactoring of the graph layout code. See: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7004 and in particular the description. Comments welcome, in particular about potential conflicts with other ongoing developments for graphs. Honestly, I won't have much time working more on this, except for adding a couple extra features I need for my research. Also I'd rather not wreak further havoc in a part of Sage I have not familiar with. Would there be some graph folk (Rob?) willing to take over the patch (and the associated spkg), and raise it to maturity and integration into Sage? Cheers, Nicolas PS: with that, I am very close to getting a nice category graph, but I need to chase a bug which will have to wait until I am more awake. -- Nicolas M. ThiƩry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net> http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---