Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 06:22:07AM -0700, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>> Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>>> Ah, by the way, a question for spkg experts: the current dot2tex spkg
>>> I built contains two separate python modules, pyparsing and dot2tex,
>>> the later depending on the former. Should there be two spkg's instead?
>>> Is it possible to state the dependency so that users could just do
>>> sage -i dot2tex... and get both installed, or at leave have a useful
>>> error message?
>> I'm not an expert, but in case it helps:  It seems that pyparsing is
>> already included with matplotlib.  However, the import statement needs
>> to be qualified:
>>
>> sage: import matplotlib.pyparsing
> 
> Ah ah, thanks much for the pointer! That will make things simpler
> indeed.
> 
> Any better suggestion than to include a patch in dot2tex's spkg to fix
> the imports?

That may be simplest.  There appear to be just three lines to modify, in

dot2tex/dotparsing.py

But I'm not sure about setup.py.  Perhaps an expert can clarify?


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to