Thanks for working on this. What more needs to be tested? The install went fine on an intel macbook running 10.6.
Maybe Robert Bradshaw should comment on it, since he wrote rubik.py? On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Dr. David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: > > I found the rubiks package would not build on Solaris with the Sun > compiler. After looking at it, this seems to be one of the worst > packages I've ever seen. It's a miracle it worked on any platform. > > * g++ was hard coded > * SAGE64 was not used at all. > * CFLAGS was set when really it should have been CXXFLAGS > * A compiler option was used to attempt to suppress assembler warnings. > * CC was set to g++ > > The list goes on. Anyway, I believe I have sorted out all the issues > with rubiks. > > The revised .spkg has been tested on > > * 32-bit Solaris SPARC with gcc > * 64-bit Solaris SPARC with gcc > * 32-bit Solaris SPARC with Sun compiler > * 64-bit Solaris SPARC with Sun compiler > * Sage.math - I think the default is 64-bit there. > * 32-bit on bsd.math with gcc > * 64-bit on bsd.math with gcc > > The ticket is here http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/7036 > > The .spkg is here > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/rubiks-20070912.p10/rubiks-20070912.p10.spkg > > > > Dave > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
