I don't think the names you're suggesting are any more natural or easy
to find.  I rather like successors and predecessors -- though I'd name
them "parents" and "children", myself.

On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Nathann Cohen <nathann.co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everybody !!!!
>
> I thought odd, a few days ago when writing some script dealing with
> DiGraphs, that Sage had no methods to list out_neighbors and in_neighbors of
> a graph. I used the functions outgoing_edges and incoming_edges to find
> them, but still...
> When trying to write a patch for that, I noticed there were functions for
> this already !
> DiGraph.successors()
> DiGraph.predecessors()
>
> Well. I think those two functions should be renamed..... I think
> DiGraph.out_neighbors() and DiGraph.in_neighbors() would be much easier to
> find and more natural...
>
> ( At the same time, I think it's be good to rename outgoing_edges to
> out_edges and incoming_edges to in_edges )
>
> What do you think about it ?
>
> Nathann
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to