On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Rob Beezer <goo...@beezer.cotse.net> wrote: > > On Oct 3, 2:47 am, Nathann Cohen <nathann.co...@gmail.com> wrote: >> DiGraph.out_neighbors() and DiGraph.in_neighbors() would be much easier to >> find and more natural... > > I'd suggest > > neighbors_in() > neighbors_out() > neighbors()
Now that *is* more natural. Introspection on graphs is a bit of a nightmare right now, thanks the the gobs of features that have been implemented. I wonder -- could we somehow consolidate things? My first idea is to break methods off into subobjects somehow; G.neighbors() G.neighbors.iterator() G.neighbors.in() G.neighbors.in.iterator() ... This would clean up tab completion, and maybe even make it possible to break the 12k line graph.py into more files. Thoughts? > > to make tab completion easier and to group them next to each other > when browsing commands with DiGraph.<tab>, plus the last one is > identical to what is available for "plain" graphs. > > Rob > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
