On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:52:14 you wrote: > I'm somewhat intrigued why there were so many options given to gcc when it > was built. It's anyones guess if one of those is causing the problem. > > There are numerous repeated options given to the g++ command which makes > me think the build process is not working well. I'm personally not > impressed with SCons used in PolyBoRi. -fPIC for example is added three > times. > > Perhaps it's me, but I prefer to compile code with as few options as > possible. Of nothing else, it means the code is more portable, as half > those options would not be acceptable to the Sun compiler for example. > Hi David,
While it is annoying it is not likely to be the problem here. Interest in including sage on Gentoo has picked up again and I get some build logs from other people. I am the only one with this issue so far, >From the error I was thinking it could be some enforcement of strictness from the compiler but I get the same thing with gcc-4.3.4 and some other people do fine with gcc-4.3.4 so there is something more subtle at play. glibc-2.10.1 may be? Francois --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
