> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 08:30:53AM -0800, YannLC wrote: > >> Just a toy implementation as a very thin layer over dict (at least it > >> should be fast) > > > > That's precisely what CombinatorialFreeModule elements are :-) > > > > Further optimizations to it are most welcome (For example, I am not > > sure += is implemented there)! > > > > Yes, the name is bad: there is nothing combinatorial to it. Merging > > this into FreeModule so that one could do FreeModule(QQ, Objects()) is > > part of the future plan. > > I have been an observer of the sage-combinat process since its > inception and, I must say, I have been mildly skeptical (very mildly).
Could you elaborate ? What's makes you skeptical ? > But if you guys allow me to view a multivariate polynomial ring as a > module over its base ring I will be very grateful. Of course they are ! I have no clue about why you say that ? Could you explain yourself ? So what ? Cheers, Florent -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
