Hi all, On 8 Jan., 19:04, Nick Alexander <ncalexan...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8-Jan-10, at 8:55 AM, javier wrote: > > After thinking about this problem making "conjugacy_class" a method > > that returns a list (or set) didn't feel right. GAP has many methods > > working on conjugacy classes, so the most natural thing to do should > > be to create a sage/python class "ConjugacyClass" for conjugacy > > classes, and wrap any desired GAP methods inside this class. Does this > > sound fine? > > I am not able to comment on this particular problem, but in general I > am a strong +1 to this approach.
Yep, this makes a lot of sense to me as well. By the way, is there any chance to create a "libGAP", i.e., a way to avoid the pexpect interface, similar to what has been done in libsingular? Cheers, Simon
-- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
