On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > while looking into updating gap to 4.4.12, I noticed that > guava used to be a separate spkg depending on gap. > Then it got merged with gap for no apparent to me reason. > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3337 > > Logically, guava is a gap package, among many others. > (currently, guava is the only one incorporated in Sage...) > > Would it make more sense to keep them as separate spkgs?
Yes. I thought it was removed some time ago http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/5701 but seems to still be there. When GAP was first added to Sage (about 4 or 5 years ago) I asked that Guava (and only Guava) be added since I did so much coding theory I wanted it in there to help with the process of integrating its coding theory functions into sage. That took several years. Now I think it can be safely removed but seems not to have been for some reason. > > Thanks, > Dmitrii > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
