well, there seems to be no patch at ticket/5701 to actually *remove* the guava code...
On Jan 24, 10:27 pm, David Joyner <wdjoy...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > while looking into updating gap to 4.4.12, I noticed that > > guava used to be a separate spkg depending on gap. > > Then it got merged with gap for no apparent to me reason. > >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3337 > > > Logically, guava is a gap package, among many others. > > (currently, guava is the only one incorporated in Sage...) > > > Would it make more sense to keep them as separate spkgs? > > Yes. I thought it was removed some time > agohttp://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/5701 > but seems to still be there. When GAP was first added to > Sage (about 4 or 5 years ago) I asked that Guava (and only > Guava) be added since I did so much coding theory > I wanted it in there to help with the process of > integrating its coding theory functions into sage. > That took several years. Now I think it can be safely > removed but seems not to have been for some > reason. > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Dmitrii > > > -- > > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > > URL:http://www.sagemath.org -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
